The purpose of a right to segregation is to ensure that certain restitution or reimbursement obligations of an institution (in this case Phoenix) are fulfilled even after insolvency proceedings have been instituted. For this reason the inclusion of these protected assets in the compensation is not mandated and rights to segregation cannot devolve upon EdW.
Compensation by EdW is the last instrument provided for by law to protect investors from total loss in case an institution becomes insolvent (in this case Phoenix).
The legal provisions do not provide an option to choose between compensation and a right to segregation.
No. Fictitious profits listed by Phoenix in account statements or balance confirmations are not eligible for compensation (see judgement of the District Court [Landgericht] of Berlin dated 1 October 2008 (4 O 297/08) in the Online Library).
In the second instance as well the Superior Court of Berlin passed a ruling on 6 January 2010 (26 U 240/08) confirming that no compensation has to be paid for fictitious profits. In a judgement dated 23 November 2010 the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) as the highest civil court rejected a claim for compensation resulting from any fictitious profits listed in Phoenix account statements.
No. Rather, EdW will await clarification of the crucial issue concerning the investors' rights to segregation against the insolvency administrator, which are not compensable according to the Deposit Guarantee and Investor Compensation Act. In this regard the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main affirmed the existence of rights to segregation in its ruling of 11 February 2010. A definitive clarification will only be brought about by an expected appeal proceeding before the Federal Court of Justice. A decision is expected to be made only in the first quarter of 2011.
With the written notification of the decision to grant a partial compensation EdW informs the investor about his/her entitlement and the compensation amount, which can up to now be ascertained only as a partial compensation, and pays the amount within the statutory period of three months (section 5 paragraph 4 sentence 1 of the EAG) to the investor. Then a limitation period of five years begins, after the expiry of which the claim relating to the partial compensation rendered can become statute-barred.
The part of the compensation withheld by EdW (security deposit retained due to putative claims for the segregation of assets) is not subject to any further limitation period. EdW will only be able to determine these "remaining" claims for compensation once it has been legally ascertained whether any segregation assets exist in the Phoenix case and how such assets, if any, are to be distributed among investors. Only after the final decision on compensation has been taken by EdW will a "second limitation period" of again five years (see above) start with regard to the then established "remaining" compensation amount.
In this respect it is unnecessary to submit requests to EdW to waive the defence of limitation.
Maturity is understood to be the point in time from which the investor may make demands resulting from his/her investment. This point in time is finally regulated in Section 5 (4) of the German Deposit Guarantee and Investor Compensation Act (EAG). According to Section 5 (4) Sentence 1 of the EAG, once EdW has ascertained the entitlement and determined the amount of the claims it has up to three months to fulfill such demands. In other words, the investor - subject to an extension of the deadline in accordance with Section 5 (4) Sentence 2 of the EAG - may not demand payment of compensation until three months after said determination has been made by EdW. Once EdW has established an investor's claim, said investor will receive a written notice thereof. N.B.: A claim remains unmatured until it has been established (see also the judgment of the District Court [Landgericht] of Berlin on 26 June 2008 - no 21 O 132/08).
Those investors who submitted their claim for compensation to EdW in full by the end of April 2005 will be notified by EdW during 2009 and can expect to receive their partial compensation before the end of 2009. Decisions about complete compensation claim files that have been received by EdW between May 2005 and mid-June 2005 are scheduled to be taken continuously until about the end of 2010. Investors who submitted their complete files at a later point in time will be informed of the decision taken on their claim until mid-2011.
Claims for compensation can expire no earlier than five years after the establishment of an investor's claim by EdW plus expiry of the three-month period in accordance with section 5 paragraph 4 sentence 1 of the EAG. In special cases the three-month period can be extended by up to three months with the approval of the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority in accordance with section 5 paragraph 4 sentence 2 of the EAG. In these cases the start of the limitation period will be postponed by the period of extension of this deadline.
For administrative and financial reasons only one confirmation of receipt is issued.
Since the Creditors’ Committee is currently undergoing insolvency proceedings, investors can obtain related information solely on the Internet pages of the insolvency administrator at www.schubra.de.
In addition to filing an application for compensation with EdW, the investor may also enter his or her claim for compensation against Phoenix in the insolvency table. The claim may be registered in its full amount.
No. Investors are informed by the insolvency administrator in writing and may file their claims independently with the insolvency administrator until September 15, 2005.
As part of the process of drawing up an insolvency plan, a consensus needs to be reached on the amount of the claims against Phoenix made by the investors. The next step is to decide on the modalities for the distribution of the insolvency assets. EdW will then be able to determine the amount of the investors’ claims for compensation in the light of pro rata repayments from the assets.
EdW will make no compensation for fictitious profits.
Setting up a pool of claimant investors against the auditor and tax consultant Dr Puckler is a matter that is entirely separate from the compensation proceedings conducted by EdW; EdW will provide no legal advice in this respect as part of its assigned tasks. Any unanswered questions on the pool should be addressed directly to the law and auditing firm Schulze & Braun GmbH. A list of questions and answers can be viewed on the Schulze & Braun GmbH website under www.schubra.de.
EdW operates on the basis of the Deposit Insurance and Investor Compensation Act (EAG).
The EdW will inform the investors who are eligible for compensation in writing on the event of claim and send them a form with which to register the claim for compensation.
The amount of compensation awarded for each investor is usually 90% of the claims from securities transactions but not more than EUR 20,000.
The amount of damages that may have occurred cannot be specified at this time. EdW may collect special contributions and take up loans if this were to become necessary for the execution of the compensation proceedings.
All investors rank equally.
Disclaimer --- To the Top
© 1998 EdW - Entschädigungseinrichtung der Wertpapierhandelsunternehmen, Berlin